A delicate voice at the other end of the long-distance line said “Sir, today my grandma passed away. I won’t be coming to the office tomorrow – and perhaps the rest of the week”. Now, I am a believing man and I believe her and “god rest the departed soul in peace” and all that sort of things. However, this is a line which I have heard so often, in contextually varying flavours. that try hard as I might, the mind declines to fully accept. While my assertion is not backed by a carefully targeted opinion poll (these days it’s a risky business!), I can say with the authority of my experience that most people have heard this line: “my XXXXXXXXXXXX passed away”. Replace the xes with ‘grandmother’ (the overwhelming favourite), ‘grandfather’, ‘grand uncle’, ‘mother-in-law’ (this is normally accompanied by a certain amount of subdued glee), ‘father-in-law’ and it will most likely ring a few bells. This statement could be followed by a leave plea or a petition to be excused from a promised task. I remember this incident from during late eighties. A friend was in the process of applying for an entrance test to a professional course. He was investigating whether he qualified for any of the many quotas and found that his blessedness stopped just short of that. Then his eyes fell on a question in the application form asking “is father deceased?” Without hesitation he penned a vehement YES as answer and looked at me, his eyes twinkling with hope, “who knows, there could be a quota for the children of ill fathers!” Obviously, the poor sod did not know the difference between ‘diseased’ and ‘deceased’. I enlightened him. After a bit of pondering he said, “who knows, there could be a quota for the children of dead fathers”, this time with a more violent twinkle in his eyes. I pointed out the only flaw in this scheme, “but, your father’s still alive and in extraordinarily robust health”. He brushed aside my protestations indicating what he thought of me and my ideas in a few crisp unprintables. He did not get the hoped for admission. Then, there was this itinerant beggar who had seen at least sixty summers if one. My mother once asked him when he came to our house to beg, “why do you beg?” She did, from time to time, belabor under the belief that she could reform such needy by asking pointed questions. To this, he replied with a disarmingly straight face, “my parents are no more”. I put him down as an eternal hoper. At the age of sixty he was aggrieved that his parents, who – had they lived – would have been not a day less than eighty, had gone off and died leaving him high and dry and without the nurturing and nourishment that was clearly his privilege! I have zero doubt that he was telling the truth about him being an orphan.
Apart from these two stray incidents of an offspring trying to benefit from the death (real or conjured) of a parent or more, I have not really come across any other episode where direct parents are rested in peace. However, when it comes to grandmothers, there seems to be no bar. They are ‘fair game’. In fact, it seems a major function of grannies is to pass away frequently and time it conveniently. Many a corporate think-tank and human resource punditage has carried out productivity analyses of the enslaved denizenry. Such scrutiny have generally focused on impact on work of marital disharmony, traffic travails, alcoholism (or teetotalism), number of children, food habits, clothing habits, meditation, art of lying and others. I even remember one study that showed incontrovertible proof including authentic statistics certified by a major management consultancy that persons within the age band of 31 and 40 years would carry out their duties more satisfactorily if they owned dogs rather than cats as pets! However, I am yet to come across an impact analysis of the granny phenomenon on office work. Anyone who takes a step in this direction is likely to uncover astounding facts. For example, I’m aware of at least eight cases when grannies were done away with on either side of long weekends. Two such cases related to the same employee. When questioned, he pointedly reminded that a person is entitled to at least two grannies and he was bent upon exercising this fundamental right. A common refrain these days is the crumbling of family values. While I would readily chip in with my two dimes in favour of this lament, I can’t help noticing that this can only benefit the granny slayers. With divorces and remarriages of parents, children come into sudden and unforeseen grannies, the way American fortune seekers used to come into windfalls during
Klondike days. There could yet come a day when an entire department would collectively celebrate, in the most convenient watering hole, bereavement of the same granny. Family run organisations, by their very nature, would be more vulnerable to such attacks. This is perhaps another compelling reason why nepotism does not make sound business sense! There is another – a more subtle – utility that derives from doing away with grannies. Sympathy can be harvested in abundance if a GB (granny bereavement) is handled appropriately. A young boy or girl wanting to grab the attention of his / her opposite number could resort to the bereavement of a loved grandmother. Handled appropriately – again – the perp could prevent the opposite number from instituting inquiries through the local gendarmerie to ascertain the truth of the matter. To be sure, such tactics normally yield only sympathy but those in the know know that it’s but a small step from sympathy to stronger emotions. Indeed GB generated sympathy can be sought by persons other than the starry eyed Laylas or Romeos. There was this ex colleague with a rather more than pedestrian affinity for fermented liquids. He normally blamed his state (which was that of a boar that has won a bet by spending a major inheritance during the short happy hour at the local pub) on various grannies and their tendency to bid farewell at the slightest pretext. Once he stood in front of my desk looking at his watch intently. When I couldn’t ignore him any longer, I asked him what the issue was. He responded gravely “my grandmother had a heart attack and ~sob sob~ she is likely to die any minute now”. Being a self-proclaimed meticulous man, he was intently watching the minutes pass. Apparently he wanted to record in his pickled mind the precise minute his granny would call it quits. Later he could claim that at that moment he was checking his watch and wondering about the granny. He then took my leave and left the office, having inveigled yet another half-day leave, ostensibly to make funeral arrangements. Since I was new there, it did make me feel mildly sympathetic towards him while wondering why no one else in the office showed overwhelming emotions. This sympathy compelled me to go to his house that evening to offer my condolences in a more formal way. I found him in a pair of striped pajamas gaily humming a ditty about a large number of semi-nude women and well into his 3rd (or 4th) bottle. He was delighted to see me. He waved me to a chair and proceeded to tip a generous amount from that bottle into a chipped glass and thrust it into my hands. If the atmosphere was funereal, I utterly failed to notice it. In fact, it was like I were suddenly transported into a slightly vulgar one-man carnival. When I couldn’t hold it any longer, I asked him how his grandmother was. He appeared confused and I had to remind him of his count-down of that noon. After some effort he seemed to connect but then, he asked me “wharrofitt?”, rather petulantly. A few more such back and forth sallies and I made him realize that his grandmother is (probably) dead and he should actually be mourning rather than behaving like a sailor on shore leave. To this he remarked “she warsn’t relly my gramma but she warr like my gramma and anyway, I last seen her 12 years back. For the life of me I can’t even recall her face” Well, the state he was in, he couldn’t recall his own face if he had seen him pass in front of him. This was clearly a case of abuse of the GB factor. Personally I have never had to resort to the GB trick. Now it’s too late. I lost one grandmother just as I got out of kindergarten. The other was in such a frighteningly vigorous health that I can all too easily imagine she could have sought to take the day off “because a grandson has passed away”. When she did finally pass away peacefully at the ripe old age of 89 on a Sunday, she had seen not just grandchildren but also their children – but never came close to allowing any of her progeny even the mildest chance of taking a day off on her! Postscript: The lady from the first paragraph actually returned to work the next day. Hers was one grandmother who did really pass away. I hereby tender my sincerest apology to her for ever doubting her – if I did. May the departed soul rest in peace.